USCG offers some leeway over delayed ballast installations

Malcolm Latarche

Malcolm Latarche · 14 April 2020

ShipInsight


Following reports of problems with delayed ballast treatment installations due to COVID-19, the US Coast Guard has attempted to alleviate the situation and avoid problems for affected vessels by allowing an extension for compliance dates to individual vessels.

The extension possibilities were announced on 9 April with the issue of Marine Safety Information Bulletin 14-20. The bulletin advises that USCG is adjusting its extension policy for those vessels impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic with BWTS compliance dates before 1 April 2021. The relevant section is as follows:

The Coast Guard expects that the installation and commissioning of a ballast water treatment system (BWTS) will be completed as scheduled for any vessel which conducts a credit drydock (inspection of the outside of the ships bottom) before 1 April 2021. In instances where the COVID-19 pandemic has rendered it impractical to perform necessary or scheduled work on a vessel, the following guidance regarding an extension is provided.

1. The Coast Guard will extend all compliance dates up to 12 months upon request. There is no need to provide any supporting documentation, however vessel owner or operator will need to identify the vessels in order for the Coast Guard to adjust the necessary documentation. It should be understood that this is not an interim extension, and additional time to accommodate operational or regulatory schedules should not be expected. For ships that undergo a credit drydock but cannot complete installation of a BWTS, owners and operators are encouraged to complete as much work as possible during the credit drydock to avoid the need for future drydock availability.

2. In those instances where an extension of more than 12 months is needed, the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel may request an extension in accordance with 33 CFR 151.2036. Requests for more than 12 months should include:

a. Documentation that a system was purchased, and arrangements were made to have it installed. As is normally provided in extension requests, contractual documents or third party correspondence that include the previously arranged date and location of installation

is adequate. b. Documentation that the system could not be installed due to COVID related restrictions. Please include third-party documentation, typically from the drydock facility or BWTS manufacturer.

c. The plan for installing the system, including a list of previously performed and scheduled work, and an estimate as to when and how installation and commissioning will be completed.

If granted, extensions longer than 12 months will be for no longer than the minimum time needed for the vessel to comply with the requirements, as determined by the Coast Guard.

In instances where arrangements were made to convert an Alternate Management System (AMS) to a Coast Guard type approved system, but the conversion was not completed due to the pandemic, an extension may be requested to continue operating the AMS under 33 CFR 151.2026(c) until the conversion can be accomplished. As noted above, requests for an extension longer than 12 months should provide details and third-party verification(s) that the arrangements for bringing a vessel into compliance were previously made but not possible due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

For planning purposes, the Coast Guard office of Operating and Environmental Standards is operating with all personnel working remotely. As such, all extension requests should be scanned and sent in by email at Environmental_Standards@uscg.mil in order to expedite review. The review and approval of an extension request could take as long as 30 days

The Journal

Published every February the journal is now recognised as the highest quality publication that covers all aspects of maritime technology and regulation and a must read for the industry.

More Details