Gard warns of increasing detention risk for unauthorised anchoring

Norwegian insurer Gard has issued an advisory warning that unauthorised anchoring in Malaysian waters is likely to result in detention. Over the years, several vessels entered with Gard have been detained and fined by the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency  for anchoring in East Johor waters without the requisite permissions from the authorities. The trend has been on the increase this year.

Norwegian insurer Gard has issued an advisory warning that unauthorised anchoring in Malaysian waters is likely to result in detention. Over the years, several vessels entered with Gard have been detained and fined by the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency  for anchoring in East Johor waters without the requisite permissions from the authorities. The trend has been on the increase this year.

Malaysian authorities recently reportedly conducted a special operation, “Jangkar Haram”, targeting ships that had anchored in waters off East Johor, without prior written permission from the Director General of the Malaysian Marine Department. In nearly all the cases Gard has handled, mariners had mistakenly understood their anchoring position to be outside Malaysian territorial waters. As Gard’s correspondent, Spica, reports in their recent circular these waters are sometimes referred to as Singapore OPL East, or sometimes as international waters.

The Malaysian governing law which sets out the limits of its territorial waters is the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA). To determine if a vessel has entered Malaysian territorial waters, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) and the Marine Department of Malaysia rely on the “1979 Territorial Waters Chart”. As such, vessels are advised to obtain a copy of the Malaysian “1979 Territorial Waters Chart” through their local agents.

All the recent detentions have been under section 491B(1) of the Malaysian Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1952 (MSO). This section stipulates ships must notify the Director of Marine of activities within Malaysian waters whenever engaging in various activities. The relevant provision in this section under which vessels have been detained by the MMEA is 491B(1)(l) which is a sweep-up provision, requiring approval be obtained for “any other activity as determined by the Director of Marine”. The provision is widely worded, which makes it difficult to challenge.

Malaysian Shipping Notice no. 05/2014 aims to clarify the definition of “any other activity” to include the following: laying up; welding and other hot works; anchoring in a non-anchorage; and any form of underwater operations. The effect of this Notice is that it is now more difficult for owners of detained vessels to argue that they were not aware of the fact that permission was needed prior anchoring.

Gard reports that it has previously seen vessels being detained by the MMEA for alleged non-payment of light dues. Section 3(1) of the Federation Light Dues Act 1953 requires the owner, agent or master of every ship which visits any port or place within Peninsular Malaysia to pay light dues.

Once a vessel has been detained, Owners can expect the following investigative steps to be taken by the MMEA:

  • The Master and Chief Officer/Chief Engineer are usually taken ashore to MMEA’s office to give their statements.
  • The Master and Chief Officer/Chief Engineer can expect to be questioned about their qualifications and experience, voyage details, and the reasons for anchoring at that specific location etc.
  • The crew’s passports and ship’s documents are also confiscated by MMEA.
  • Owners will have to appoint a local Malaysian agent, and it is recommended that owner’s representative (local agent, correspondent, or a lawyer) accompanies the crew member when the statement is being taken by the MMEA investigating officer. An owners’ local representative would be able to assist with translating the questions asked by the investigating officer into English, as well as deal with the authorities on behalf of the owners.

Investigation could take anywhere between 1-3 days, or even longer and owners may have to make arrangements, through their local agents, for overnight stay of the Master ashore.

Once statements have been taken from the crew, MMEA will hand the case over to the Marine Department. For the purposes of securing the release of the vessel a hearing may be fixed before the magistrate. Owners usually will be represented by a lawyer at the hearing and will be required to pay a bond to release the vessel under section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). A bond is a security paid by owners for the release of the vessel, as security for a fine or compound to be set at a later date. The bond is paid by a fixed deposit through opening an account under the name of the Court appointed bailor – usually the local agent.

Once the bond is paid and ship’s documents returned to the vessel, the vessel can be released. Thereafter, a decision can be taken whether to admit liability and pay the compound, (pay a lower penalty in exchange for admitting liability for the charges), or dispute the charges. The maximum fine for each offence is MYR 100,000 (approximately $24,000).

Gard suggests that if anchoring in locations within the purported boundaries of the 1979 Territorial Waters Chart, owners appoint a local agent in Malaysia. Gard has been informed that the Marine Department of Malaysia has established dedicated lay-up anchorages in waters off East Johor. Owners can contact their local agents for further information. Mariners must check with the appointed local agents that the Director of Marine has been informed before anchoring and written permission obtained.

Copy link
Powered by Social Snap